Tuesday, June 21, 2022
6500/7500 SCALE FROM 1.1.1996 OF INCOME TAX AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT IS POSTED FOR TODAY IE.21.06.2022
Case Details
Bench :- Bombay
CNR No. :- HCBM010369112012
Stamp No. :- WPST/25148/2012
Filing Date :- 10/09/2012
Reg. No. :- WP/9649/2012
Reg. Date :- 08/10/2012
Petitioner :-
UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ORS -
Respondent :-
INCOME TAX GAZETTED OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, THROUGH RAJESH RAJESH MENON AND ORS -
Petn.Adv. :-
THE LAW POINT (154)
Resp.Adv. :-
R.NO. 1 (0)
District :- MUMBAI Bench :- DIVISION
Status :- Pre-Admission
Next Date :- 21/06/2022 Stage :- FOR ADMISSION
Coram :- HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MAKARAND SUBHASH KARNIK
Last Date. :- 14/06/2022 Stage :- FOR ADMISSION
Last Coram :- HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MAKARAND SUBHASH KARNIK
Act :- Administrative Tribunal Act
PLEASE NOTE: FUTURE DATES IN CASE OF PRE-ADMITTED CASES ARE COMPUTER GENERATED PROVISIONAL DATES OF LISTING EXCEPT WHERE HON'BLE COURTS HAVE GIVEN DUE DATES. THE PROVISIONAL DATES MAY CHANGE, SUBJECT TO LISTING DIRECTIONS OF THE RESPECTIVE HON'BLE COURTS FROM TIME TO TIME. PLEASE MONITOR DAILY CAUSELISTS FOR CONFIRMED LISTINGS.
Friday, May 31, 2019
Monday, March 4, 2019
Grade Pay of 6600 after 20 years to ACP Inspectors- Representation
Friends, the following is my representation for GP 6600 as 2nd MACP in PB3 after 20 years. Please go through and make suggestions if any otherwise I am going to submit the same shortly. Interested people can follow this. We will further proceed with legal course after reasonable time.
To Date:
5th Mar’2019
The Principal
Commissioner,
CGST and
Central Tax & Cadre Controlling Authority,
Hyderabad
Zone,
HYDERABAD
(Through
Proper Channel)
Respected Sir,
Subject:- Grant of 2nd MACP on
completion of 20 years regular
service w.e.f. 03.05.2013 in the
Grade Pay of 6600 in PB3
and disbursement of Arrears of
pay - request –Reg.
1.
I joined as
direct recruit Inspector in Department on 03.05.1993. I was granted benefit of
First ACP (Assured Career Progression) w.e.f. 03.05.2005 as I had already
completed the requisite length of 12 years of regular service in the entry
grade of Inspector of Central Excise and Customs and thus, I was placed in the
pay scale of Rs. 7500-250-12000 (of Superintendent). I stood placed in the
grade of Superintendent of Central Excise w.e.f. 03.05.2005.
2.
I was
promoted to the grade of Superintendent vide your office Establishment Order
(GO) No. 22/2011 dated 9.5.2011 and joined the said post of
Superintendent on promotion on 13.5.2011. No benefit of pay fixation was
extended to me on promotion.
3.
I was
granted 2nd MACP in PB-2 with Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/ w.e.f. 03.05.2013 vide
your office Establishment Order (NGO)No. 123/2015 dated 03.09.2015 after
completion of 20 years of regular service.
4.
I was
granted NFG of 5400 in PB2 w.e.f. 03.05.2009 retrospectively when I have completed
four years of regular service in the grade pay of 4800(pre-revised
7500-250-12000) in compliance of CAT Hyderabad OA No 1051/2010. After granting
the NFU 5400 GP in PB2 on 03.05.2009, I was supposed to be granted 2nd MACP on completion of 20 years
of regular service as on 03.05.2013 in
grade pay 6600 in PB3 as the grade pay of 5400 granted to me in PB2 and
the grade pay of 5400 in PB3 are one and the same. Presently my pay is fixed in
Level 9 of the Pay Matrix as per Seventh Pay Commission with basic pay of Rs. 80200/-
w.e.f. 01.07.2018.
5.
In the
backdrop of the above facts relating to my service, your good self is requested
to sympathetically consider the under-mentioned judgments which have become Law
of the Land in recent times.
a) In the matter of Hari Ram & Anr.
Vs. Registrar General in WP (C) No.9357/2016 the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi
has decided the question whether the Petitioners have been rightly denied the
benefit of 3rd MACP after they were given the benefit of NFG on completion of 4
years period in their existing post. The Petitioners claimed that the Grant of
Rs 5400/- Grade Pay is an financial up gradation in the form of Non Functional
Grade which is an integral part of their pay scale, to preclude their claim for
the grant of third financial upgradation. In this context, Hon’ble Bench has
observed that unlike “stagnation” or performance based increments, or placement
in higher scales, the grant of Rs. 5400/- is automatic, after happening of a
certain event, i.e. completion of 4 years’ service. Thereafter, the Hon’ble
Bench had held in their Judgement pronounced on 20.12.2017 that the grant of a
higher grade pay did not preclude the grant of the third financial up gradation.
The petition had succeeded. The above said judgement has evidently achieved its
finality as no further appeal has been preferred by the Respondents of the WP (
C ) No. 9357/2016. Evidently it has, therefore, become the Law of the Land that
the benefit of 2nd or 3rd MACP shall not be offset against the NFG of 5400
grade pay granted under VI th Pay Commission.
b) In S. Balakrishnan case in W.P.
No.11535 of 2014 the Hon’ble Madras High Court in their Order dated 16.10.2014
has held that “ Financial upgradation given to respondents 1 to 3 in the
subject case was revised solely on the ground that Grade Pay of Rs. 5400 in
PB-2 and Rs. 5400 in PB-3 shall be treated as separate Grade Pays for the
purpose of financial upgradation under MACPs. Such a view was taken by taking a
literal interpretation of Clause 8(1) of MACPs without taking into account the
purpose for which the very scheme was evolved.” The Hon.ble Bench has further
observed that “the petitioners proceeded as if Grade Pay of Rs. 5400 in PB-3 is
higher Grade pay to the Grade pay of Rs. 5400 in PB-2” and thus held that “the
immediate next higher Grade of Pay to the Grade Pay of Rs. 5400 is Rs. 6600/-.”
The said Order dated 16.10.2014 of Hon’ble Madras High Court has also become
the Law of the Land in as much as SLP No. 15396/2015 filed by Union of India
against the said Order dated 16.10.2014 has already been dismissed on Merit by
Hon’ble Supreme Court by their Order dated 31.08.2015. Resultantly, it cannot
be contended by the Government that the Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- in PB-2 and Rs.
5400/- in PB-3 shall be treated as separate Grade Pays for the purpose of
upgradation under MACPs.
c) As
per MACP rules macp is to be granted only to next immediate higher
grade pay but not to next immediate grade pay. Whether it is in PB2 or
PB3 after 5400 grade pay next higher grade pay is only 6600 grade pay.
As per para 2 of MACP Scheme, the MACPS envisages merely placement in the
immediate next higher grade pay in the hierarchy of the recommended revised pay
bands and grade pay as given in Section 1 , Part-A of the first schedule of the
CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Thus the scheme recommends immediate next
higher grade pay and de-linked the grade pay of promotional post. It means
there is no connection between MACP and next promotional grade. Therefore,
whatever the immediate next higher grade pay available has to be given on MACP
irrespective of whether it is immediate promotional grade or otherwise.
d) As
per para 5 of MACP scheme ‘promotions earned/ up gradations granted under ACP
scheme in the past to those grades which now carry the same grade pay due to
merger of pay scales/ up gradations of posts recommended by the sixth
pay commission shall be ignored for the purpose of granting up gradations
under Modified ACPs. Therefore, the upgradation granted in grade pay of
5400 to officers after 4 years in 4800 grade pay, as recommended by VI pay
commission should be ignored for the purpose of granting MACP. Further, the
para 8.1 clarifies only that the grade pay 5400 in pb2 & in pb3 will be
treated as different grade pays but it cannot be treated as higher grade pay.
e) There are large number of other
judgements of Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal (various Benches) and
Hon’ble High Courts on the subject matter which are in consonance with the
above discussed Laws of Land but for the sake of brevity, the same have not been
referred herein intentionally.
f) On examination of the above discussed
Laws of the Land, it emerges that :-
(i) NFG in Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- in PB-3
is admissible w.e.f. 01.01.2006 to
the officers who have completed their 4 years’ regular service in the pay
scales corresponding to the Grade Pay of Rs. 4800/- in PB-2 because the
officers by virtue of their length of service have invariably reached to their
basic pay in the span of running Pay Band-3 (Rs. 15600 to Rs. 39100) by the
time they get NFG and as per the Law of the Land evolved in the case of
S.Balakrishnan and Ors in W.P.No.11535 of 2014 dated
16.10.2014 of Madras High Court, it has been
stipulated that there is no separate Grade Pays of Rs. 5400/- in PB-2 and PB-3.
The Hon’ble Court was of
the view that Clause 8(1) of the Office Memorandum should be treated as a
corollary to Clause 8. According to the Tribunal, Clause 8(1) would be
applicable only to those Departments, which provide for promotion to the post
carrying the same Grade Pay.
(ii) Benefits of 2nd MACP cannot be denied
to the officers who had completed 20 years of service on that date i.e. after 01.01.2006
and who had also been granted NFG of 5400 in PB2. Accordingly, such officers
are entitled to the benefits of 2nd MACP in the Grade Pay of Rs. 6600/- w.e.f. the
date of completion of 20 years, as it has become the Law of the Land that the
immediate next higher Grade Pay to the Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- is Rs. 6600/-
and benefit of MACP cannot be denied on the pretext that upgradation in the
form of NFG has already been given to the officers.
g) It is very humbly requested that
considering the above legal provisions which have reached their respective finality,
I may please be given the benefits of MACP in the under-mentioned manner.
i) My pay may please be fixed in PB-3 with
Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- w.e.f. 03.05.2009 as the benefit of NFG.
ii) My pay may please be further fixed in
PB-3 with Grade Pay of Rs. 6600/- w.e.f. 03.05.2013 as the benefit of 2nd MACP.
Thanking You,
Yours sincerely,
(P.VIGNESHWA RAJU)
Superintendent
Copy submitted to,
The Principal Commissioner,
Audit-II Commissionerate,
Hyderabad.
Friday, November 30, 2018
Saturday, August 11, 2018
Hyderabad CCA Inspector to Supdt promotions Aug 2018
Thursday, July 19, 2018
Friday, April 20, 2018
Friday, October 13, 2017
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
DEPT APPEAL OF SUBRAMANYAM CASE ON 5400 TO ACP INSPECTORS' DISMISSED BY APEX COURT JUST NOW
News from Delhi...
The Subramanian case on GP 5400 came up before the Hon'ble SC today. We engaged Dr. Counsel Shri. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv.. Briefed the Counsels and handed over SC decision on the same case sent by Com. P.Vigneswara Raju. The Sr. Counsel submitted the same. The Bench dismissed the SLP of the dept. Details later.
The Subramanian case on GP 5400 came up before the Hon'ble SC today. We engaged Dr. Counsel Shri. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv.. Briefed the Counsels and handed over SC decision on the same case sent by Com. P.Vigneswara Raju. The Sr. Counsel submitted the same. The Bench dismissed the SLP of the dept. Details later.
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
Friday, June 16, 2017
Thursday, June 1, 2017
Friday, May 19, 2017
Thursday, May 18, 2017
Sunday, April 23, 2017
Govt to unveil Rs 5,000-Crore Pension plan, 5 mn Central Employees to benefit
Govt to unveil Rs
5,000-Crore Pension plan, 5 mn Central Employees to benefit
The
Union cabinet is set to approve next week a new Rs 5,000-crore pension formula
that is expected to benefit more than five million central government
employees.
Official
sources said the new formula will calculate pension based on the latest drawn
salary for a particular post.
“If
a person retired as a director under the sixth pay commission, ten years later
his pension would be fixed (based on) the salary of a director in the seventh
pay commission,” explained a senior government official.
“The
new pension scheme will be put up to cabinet for approval next week.”
The
new method was fixed by an empowered committee of secretaries (Ecos) headed by
secretary (pensions).
The
seventh pay commission recommended that pension could be calculated by two
methods: One, pension would be 50% of the last salary and multiplied by 2.57.
The second was an incremental method where pension was fixed at the last salary
drawn with adjustments of increments drawn in that particular pay band.
The
incremental method was found to have lacunae as 20% of records were found to be
missing in various government departments, and officials felt this could lead
to litigation in future.
“To
avoid legal hurdles, the Ecos came up with the pay fixation method,” explained
the senior officialThursday, March 30, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)