ORDER OF APEX COURT IN CA NO. 1198/2005 IN RATIO CASE

ITEM NO.MM-4A COURT NO.4 SECTION IX


S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. No. 8 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1198 OF 2005
S.P. DUDEJA & ANR. Appellant (s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(For modification/clarification)

Date: 30/03/2012 This Application was called on in
mentioning Board today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE


For Appellant(s) Mr. J.K. Das, Sr. Adv.
Mr. S.K. Das, Adv.
Mr. P.P. Nayak, Adv.
Mr. Parmanand Gaur,Adv.-on-Record

For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh,Adv.
Mr. S.C. Jha, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.
Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv.
for Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv.-on-Record

For Applicant(s) Ms. Indira Jai Singh, ASG
Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv

For Intervenor Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Adv.-on-Record
Mr.Raj Kumar Parashar, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

Taken on Board.

The application is dismissed. However, the
time to implement the said order is extended by a
further period of three months from today.


[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ]
Court Master Court Master


[ Signed order is placed on the file ]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

I.A. No. 8 OF 2012
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1198 OF 2005

S.P. Dudeja & Anr. .. Appellant(s)
Versus
Union of India & Ors. .. Respondent(s)

O R D E R


Taken on Board.

Having heard Ms. Indra Jai Singh, learned Additional
Solicitor General,we are of the view that order dated 3rd August,2011 does not warrant any modification/clarification.

Accordingly, the application is dismissed. However, the time to implement the said order is extended by a further period of three months from
today.


......................
[ D.K. JAIN, J. ]



......................
[ ANIL R. DAVE, J. ]



NEW DELHI,
MARCH 30, 2012.