. FLASH !!! DEPT APPEAL OF SUBRAMANYAM CASE ON 5400 TO ACP INSPECTORS' DISMISSED BY APEX COURT News from Delhi...

yes

It is to clarify that the Time Scale of 5400 in PB2 is required to be given to Group B officers after 4 years from the date there are placed in GP 4800 either on ACP/MACP or on promotion.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

MESSAGE RECEIVED FROM SG AIACEGEO


 Dear friends,
 1) It is being learnt that RR’s have been cleared by Law Ministry. As per news, the review of sanctioned strength after every 2 years has not been incorporated in RR’s. Perhaps RR’s have been sent now to Law Ministry for Hindi version.
2) Cadre restructuring proposal is to be submitted to cadre review committee by DOPT. One more meeting of CBEC was held with DOPT on the issue. DOPT is again asking for some repeated clarifications like filling up all the cadre restructuring vacancies by promotion as a onetime measure, methodology for seniority between promotee & DR, functional justification for JTS posts and fate of these after five years, share in GDP, rationale for proposed increase in the manpower vs various information technology projects, encadrement of posts of Chairman and Members, functional justification for Audit Commissionerates, SIU Study in r/o group ‘B’ & ‘C’, increase in the manpower vs austerity measure etc.
3) CAT case for parity has been placed for 19.10.12 as nobody attended the court yesterday on 11.09.12 from govt side. No reply has been filed by the govt till date.
4) A draft to create a separate service for us is attached herewith for necessary additions/suggestions/amendments. It’s a simple draft only needing due deliberations. It is, however, clear on the basis of the talks made to DOPT & UPSC authorities that it is the only solution to remove our stagnation on permanent basis enabling our officers to reach higher levels.
5) I hope that 26.09.12 programme is being observed everywhere with full preparedness. A poster is attached herewith which may be used to reflect our demands during the observance & preparation of the programme.
6) Our officers have not been given the benefit of the extended panel either at the time of implementation of Supreme Court judgement regarding the ratio of 6:2:1 or in the latest DPC held in June, 12. The OM No. 22011/4/98-Estt.(D) dated 12 Oct 1998 of DOPT says about the use of extended panel of in-service officers in lieu of the retired officers. This OM is a clarificatory one of the DOPT OM No.22011/5/86-Estt. (D) dt. 10.4.89 describing the procedure to conduct DPC for the promotions. The procedure to be adopted for extended panel has been laid down in DOPT OM No. 22011/8/87-Estt.(D) dated 9.4.96. All of these three OM's are available on Circular Portal site circulars.nic.in. At the time of the regularisation of the post-1979 promotions, CBEC should have prepared the extended panel to give the benefit of the promotions to our in-service officers. It means that the CBEC has done this work in incomplete manner which needs to be completed now. All the affected/concerned officers may, therefore, file their representations to the concerned authorities accordingly. The Association has already sent a general representation to CBEC.
7) If any of the officer/s is having the seniority list for post-1978 period, one copy of the same may kindly be sent to me at 240, Razapur, Ghaziabad-201001 (U.P.).
Love,
Ravi.

No comments: